Re: Suggestion for 3.0

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:51:14 +0100

Thanks.

The first patch has been committed with a small change to use less
redundant code.

As for the second patch a slightly different but automatic approach
was selected. The generated config file now includes the actual Squid
version it was generated for.

Regards
Henrik

On Tuesday 11 March 2003 01.12, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> Ok. I've just made an attempt at this and seems to work...
>
> Patch at http://www.reub.net/squid/accelopts.patch
>
> You're welcome to apply it if it looks ok ;)
>
> There's also another patch
> http://www.reub.net/squid/squid-version-change.patch, for a
> stupidly trivial change that we probably should make to squid.conf
> sometime - instead of "Welcome to Squid 2" it obviously should be 3
> :)
>
> Reuben
>
> At 10:07 AM 2/03/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> >This you probably can manage by guessing and looking at the
> > existing code, without knowing how to program in C.
> >
> >I would suggest you at least give it a try.
> >
> >Regards
> >Henrik
> >
> >On Sunday 02 March 2003 01.34, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> > > I would love to...but I don't know how to write code...shall I
> > > just add it to bugzilla as a RFE ?
> > >
> > > reuben
> > >
> > > At 02:50 PM 1/03/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> > > >A patch is welcome.
> > > >
> > > >Regards
> > > >Henrik
> > > >
> > > >On Saturday 01 March 2003 12.36, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> > > > > Hi Henrik,
> > > > >
> > > > > Any chance with the latest set of accelerator changes
> > > > > you've committed to squid-3.0 that you could add some extra
> > > > > statement to the port binding statements to indicate what
> > > > > the port is specified to do if any [option] is set for the
> > > > > port?
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words instead of just this in the startup log for
> > > > > squid:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2003/03/01 22:31:34| Accepting HTTP connections at
> > > > > 203.29.67.130, port 3128, FD 13.
> > > > >
> > > > > Print this instead:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2003/03/01 22:31:34| Accepting accelerated HTTP connections
> > > > > at 203.29.67.130, port 3128, FD 13.
> > > > > or
> > > > > 2003/03/01 22:31:34| Accepting transparent HTTP connections
> > > > > at 203.29.67.130, port 3128, FD 13.
> > > > > 2003/03/01 22:31:34| Accepting accelerated vhost HTTP
> > > > > connections at 203.29.67.130, port 3128, FD 13.
> > > > >
> > > > > Would be quite cool...I'm testing this out a bit now and
> > > > > running port 80 in transparent mode but port 3128 in normal
> > > > > proxy mode all on the same IP address.
> > > > >
> > > > > reuben
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >-- Reuben Farrelly West Ryde, NSW 2114,
> > > > > Australia
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Reuben Farrelly West Ryde, NSW 2114, Australia
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Reuben Farrelly West Ryde, NSW 2114, Australia
Received on Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:51:29 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:14:02 MST