Re: [squid-users] *****SPAM***** error when starting squid

In message <3E5CD9AF.2F224402@imec.be> (on 26 February 2003 16:13:51 +0100), marc.elsen@imec.be (Marc Elsen) wrote:
>
>
>deny wrote:
>>
>> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
>> SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
>> SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
>> SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
>> SPAM:
>> SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.00 hits, 5 required)
>> SPAM: X_ACCEPT_LANG (-0.4 points) Found a X-Accept-Language header
>> SPAM: TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL (2.1 points) To: repeats address as real name
>> SPAM: USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM (1.0 points) X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA (Netscape)
>> SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.6 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low)
>> SPAM: DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 (1.7 points) Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date
>> SPAM:
>> SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
>
> ??? Any particular reason for sharing these 'Egyptian body headers'
>with the
> whole list.

These are from the list going through a rather out-of-date version of
SpamAssassin, including the distinct bug of that USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM
should have been a negative score. I suggest updating to 2.43 at the
minimum.

              -Allen

-- 
Allen Smith                       http://cesario.rutgers.edu/easmith/
February 1, 2003                               Space Shuttle Columbia
Ad Astra Per Aspera                     To The Stars Through Asperity