Either way is fine. General recommendation for cache_dir is one
cache_dir per disk.
However, 64GB och cache will require quite a bit of memory. See the
Squid FAQ for details. (not really related to the question, but is good
to know)
Regards
Henrik
tis 2003-02-18 klockan 15.38 skrev Jack:
> Hello All,
>
> I configured squid and set 64GB for cache_dir.
>
> Can i set whole 64 GB as single cache_dir as
>
> cache_dir aufs /cache01 65535 158 255
>
> or
>
> cache_dir aufs /cache01 6656 16 256
>
> cache_dir aufs /cache02 6656 16 256
>
> cache_dir aufs /cache03 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache04 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache05 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache06 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache07 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache08 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache09 6656 16 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache10 6656 16 256
>
> I divided my cache directory does not exceed first level directories to 16
>
> Which will be the best option for better performance ?
>
> Regards,
> Jack
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
-- Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> MARA Systems AB, SwedenReceived on Tue Feb 18 2003 - 09:31:49 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:13:27 MST