On Donnerstag, Jänner 30, 2003, at 11:44 Uhr, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tor 2003-01-30 klockan 10.35 skrev David:
>
>> Well in this case the RAID controller does play a significant role.
>> Since the drives are logical and purely handled by the controller it
>> also decides about teh read/write and queue operations trying to keep
>> all 4 drives equally busy and the spindles in sync.
>
> Note: The transaction patterns reaching the controller is mostly the
> same, regardless if you have one or many partitions. Because of this
> there is no benefit in performance for Squid to have more than one
> cache
> partition per set of drives in a RAID.
>
*nod* looking at it in cachemgr.cgi it is doing pretty well, but right
now there is not enough traffic in the house to test it properly.
You are of course correct and I shall implement your suggestions
tomorrow.
-d
- we may race and we may run, but we can not undo what has been done.
Received on Thu Jan 30 2003 - 04:58:35 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:12:59 MST