Stephan Austermuehle wrote:
> > Anyway, this 200K/s is by no means an indication of the performance or
> > speed of your Squid. It is only a signal that your Squid needs more
> > things to do for using aufs efficiently. The more concurrent things you
> > give it to work with the faster it goes, up to the point where your
> > hardware cannot handle more.
>
> This meets my own test results. Throughput dramatically increases when a
> second request is issued to the Squid Cache. Please let me know if I can
> do anything for getting the problem resolved (beside programming...).
Programming is needed as it is by design of how aufs tells Squid that an
I/O operation have completed.
aufs is designed for caches with many concurrent users in mind.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Jan 02 2003 - 08:44:01 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:12:24 MST