Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance Issues

From: MASOOD AHMAD <masoodnt10@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 06:07:04 -0800 (PST)

hay thats good for new experience again ...
if you can try it to Red Hat Linux or FreeBSD I think
they will work. try to use 2.2.4 glibc version and
then check it.....

Best Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah

--- Stephan Austermuehle <au@hcsd.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 05:20:11AM -0800, MASOOD
> AHMAD wrote:
>
> > okk share with us afer using diskd .........
>
> Using diskd shows the same effects as aufs: a
> maximum of about 210
> kByte/s throughput on clients as well as the server
> itself. No
> difference between 2.4STABLE7 und 2.5STABLE1.
>
> I recompiled Squid 2.5STABLE1 with --disable-poll.
> Surprise: Throughput
> doubled (now about 400 kByte/s) for diskd and aufs
> while ufs still
> delivers very high (and expected) performance.
>
> Another surprise: I let two wget request the same
> URI (one wget on the
> Squid Cache server system, one on a network client).
> While both are
> running throughput rises to 1.3 MByte/s (diskd)
> resp. 6.0 MByte/s
> (aufs). Maybe there is a bug in the thread handling
> in Squid or glibc
> (I'm using 2.2.5)?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Stephan
>

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Mon Dec 30 2002 - 07:07:05 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:12:15 MST