What I can say is that it defenitely is NOT a configuration bug. The error is
internal to Squid. It is only that I cannot find what is causing it.
Regards
Henrik
BONHERBE, Laurent wrote:
> I see... Ok, then let's say it's a bug due to a misconfiguration on my
> side... Here's what I want to do : install one prioritazation where a few
> users get my whole bandwith (512 kbps), and another where some other users
> get, say, 32 kbps each of a half of my bandwith (256 kbps)... How do I
> write that correctly, so that I don't get that bug?
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Envoyé : samedi 18 mai 2002 00:38
> À : BONHERBE, Laurent
> Cc : 'squid-users@squid-cache.org'
> Objet : Re: [squid-users] Delay pools problem
>
> "BONHERBE, Laurent" wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > I have a little problem now with squid 2.4 stable 4. I defined some
> > delaypools, and squid is dying regularly, saying me :
> > 2002/05/17 09:58:36| assertion failed: delay_pools.c:403: "i <
> > NET_MAP_SZ" What is happening? What did I do wrong? What should I do?
> > Thanks in advance, best regards,
>
> Looks like a bug. But I find nothing immediately obvious in the code..
> 256 entries filled with unique numbers between 0-255 cannot be more than
> 256 entries..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Received on Thu May 23 2002 - 07:21:08 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:08:12 MST