Re: [squid-users] cache misses

Near Hits will generally be about the same as Misses. I don't see any
problems with this output other than cache misses being slow, but there
is little Squid can do about that. Unless you are seeing significantly
less latency without the cache than on cache misses, the only thing to
be done is make the network go faster. ;-)

Van Bossche Koen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had problems in 3 countries with there local squid boxes going to the
> internet thru the parent. Performance was pretty slow. The issue was time
> synchronisation. I had it only installed on the parent ones and installed
> ntp now on all. It immediatly reflected and performance seems is ok, except
> for 1 local box.
> The cachemgr.cgi mentions high values for Cache Misses and Near Hits :
> HTTP Requests (All): 2.13280 1.91442
> Cache Misses: 2.50793 2.50793
> Cache Hits: 0.00194 0.05633
> Near Hits: 2.13280 1.91442
> Not-Modified Replies: 0.03427 0.06286
> DNS Lookups: 0.00190 0.00278
> ICP Queries: 0.00000 0.00000
>
> I assume since the Near Hits are this high that they have a problem on their
> local lan or on the box itself. Is that correct?
>
> regards,
> ./koen
>
>
>

-- 
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
http://www.swelltech.com
Web Caching Appliances and Support