Can I assume that to see the mimimum sized object in cache, the thing to do is the same that is presented in FAQ (7.2) , but as
sort -n +4 -5 access.log | awk '{print $5, $7}' | head -25
instead of
sort -r -n +4 -5 access.log | awk '{print $5, $7}' | head -25
? ( I got the reverse flag "-r" out )
The strangest thing is that I get a bunch of lines stating "0" as size... Does this mean I have a huge amount of entryes im my cache of 0 bytes? This is stupid! Maybe on can get a better cache usage by setting the minimum object size in cache to something like 4 bytes ? I mean, is it suposed to have "0" sized objects cached?
I'm using Squid 2.4 Stable 1
Thanks
-- Joćo Pedro Clemente - jpcl @ rnl.ist.utl.pt Linux 2.4.16 (LFS 3.1) on a i686 - up 4:08Received on Thu Apr 11 2002 - 17:40:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:07:32 MST