On to , 2002-04-11 at 14:39, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 April 2002 13:56, Marc Elsen wrote:
>
> You'll probably still hit it. I was able to reliably reproduce a kernel
> oops when I was benchmarking various Squid revisions a few weeks back on
> ext3 and ReiserFS. I was able to hit it with Squid 2.4.STABLE4, which
> you've said hasn't happened for you.
>
> I had no similar problems about 6 months ago when testing ext3 with
> Squid 2.4.STABLE1, or thereabouts....but I suspect a bug has crept into
> ext3--not into Squid (though bugs do creep into Squid too...I haven't
> had any problems with my ReiserFS systems, and I've got a ton of those
> performing reliably with STABLE6).
I have been running squid on RH Linux 7.2 for quite some time without
any problems. I have used ext3 since redhat put it in their releases
(7.2 beta). Current proxy has about 1000 req/min, and has not failed me
yet. A test i did, with considerably higher load, also worked
flawlessly.
Vanilla redhat, with redhat-packaged squid (2.4-STABLE3 now)
Jon O
Received on Thu Apr 11 2002 - 16:21:11 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:07:32 MST