Aman Raheja wrote:
> Thank you so much gentlemen
> Though I feel dumb after having read the responses as the squid
> documentation starts off saying that it is a HTTP cache proxy server.
> Though I am a novice - it's not a good excuse !!! :)
>
> 1> Anyhow, I want to ask that if I don't really need a cache server
> would IP masquerading be efficient enough to take over the proxy job of
> squid.
IP Masquerading is more 'efficient' than an application level proxy in
one sense (it requires almost no computing resources--while Squid is a
resource hog in comparison). But if efficiency also takes into account
bandwidth and latency, Squid is a much more efficient solution. Just
depends on your needs.
> 2> Also let me know what is the use of acls menntioning safe ports in
> the squid.conf ?
They are simply the ports that Squid will allow clients to connect to.
Nothing complicated about it, really. Squid has ACLs for everything. ;-)
-- Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com> http://www.swelltech.com Web Caching Appliances and SupportReceived on Thu Apr 04 2002 - 10:32:13 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:07:21 MST