Simon White wrote:
>But as a new adopter, doing a new compile for one machine, I might still
>be persuaded to downgrade to 2.95 to avoid all this question. The shit has
>been thrown, and it is sticking. Even if it is thrown by FUDders (whatever
>that may mean).
>I have a couple versions of Squid compiled with 2.96 that have not
>exhibited any problems, and I will take your word for it Joe, that I can
>use 2.96 and not have to grab a 2.95 RPM and waste time unnecessarily for
>what may be a non-issue.
Regarding this topic, check this, maybe this is useful:
---------------------------
From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Subject: Re: 2.4.19-pre4: Compiler crash in i386/kernel/mpparse.c
Newsgroups: linux.kernel
View: Complete Thread (3 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2002-03-21 14:00:18 PST
> gcc crashes compiling arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c line 41
>
> gcc version 3.0.2 20010905 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 3.0.1-3)
> (the one shipped with RH 7.2)
Use 2.96. gcc 3.0 isnt a good compiler choice for 2.4.x kernels - 3.0.4
seems to be doing the right thing but not 3.0.x x<4. 3.1 snapshots are
also looking very promising
--------------------------
Regards,
J. Carminati.
Received on Tue Mar 26 2002 - 05:49:40 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:07:05 MST