RE: [squid-users] Squid As Replacement for MS ISA Server

On our network, we currently have squid allowing
anon access out for our W2k clients, but we want
access control via integrated authentication.

Hopefully Squid 2.5...i'm looking into it.

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Edmund Haworth [mailto:ehaworth@wortech.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:54 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid As Replacement for MS ISA Server

Is there an example configuration of this?

We have just installed Win2k over our student networks, and really don't
want to move away from our squid server

Thanks,

Edmund Haworth
Network Engineer
Worcester College of Technology
Deansway
Worcs WR1 2JF

Tel: +44 1905 725516
Fax: +44 1905 28906
E-mail: ehaworth@wortech.ac.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: Lai, Raymond [mailto:Raymond.Lai@pharma.com]
Sent: 25 February 2002 15:48
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] Squid As Replacement for MS ISA Server

Hi Everyone,
I am new to this mailing list and to Squid.

My company is evaluating ISA Server for our Windows 2000
domain as it incorporates Windows Integrated Authentication.

Bascially, they want client credentials to be passed transparently
to the ISA Server, which will either allow or block them.

As an alternative, I have heard that Squid 2.5 can authenticate
Windows clients without a "pop-up" authentication box when
a browser window is opened. I plan to test on my Debian Woody box.

Is anyone running a Squid box which can authenticate Windows
clients (based on Active Directory groups) w/o the "pop-up"
authentication box?

Thanks much!
Ray

> raymond w.m. lai
> purdue pharma l.p. (stamford, ct)
> raymond.lai@pharma.com
> www.pharma.com
>
Received on Tue Feb 26 2002 - 08:28:37 MST