Sorry, I don't know about the tweaking of the kernel that you asked about.
Given the small number of users that I support, my concern is more
focused on minimizing cache latency than on boosting the number of
req/sec. The defaults provided on RedHat's v6.x and v7.2 distros have
always provided enough connections for my needs.
On Saturday 09 February 2002 05:54 am, khiz code wrote:
> You Got it steve
> i m sticking with 2.2.19 coz of the problems that ppl have had to face
> with 2.4.x
> but i m not too entirely happy with my 2.2.19
> keep on getting out of memory errors under traffic at times
> do i need to reserve more memory for the kernel .. how do i do that
> btw are the start up scripts tuning okay
> waiting for a reply
> Khiz
>
> --- Steve Snyder <swsnyder@home.com> wrote:
> > Given that you're running a SMP system, you'd probably get improved
> > performance by moving to a v2.4 kernel. A lot of the kernel
> > processing, like network traffic, was serialized in v2.2.x.
> >
> > Are staying with the older kernel because of reliability concerns? I
> > know that the v2.4 kernels got off to a rocky start, but I've found
> > v2.4.17 to be very stable in the 6 weeks since it was released.
> >
> > On Wednesday 06 February 2002 11:36 pm, khiz code wrote:
> > > Hello Joe
> > > Gosh . u still remember me .. guess ppl dont kinda tend to forget
> > > pests so very soon ;-)
> > >
> > > i Have a compaq proliant 5500 series
> > > dual P11 Xeon 550 Mhz
> > > 512 megs Ram
> > > 5 SCSI Ultra -2 10000 rpm disks of 9 GB each .. the cache dirs are
> > > spread over 4 disks as 3GB slices for a total cache size of 12 GB
> > > .. each on a seperate reiserfs partition
> > > compaq Netelligent 10/100 mbps nics
> > > this is redhat 6.2 with 2.2.19 kernel compiled with ip_wccp as a
> > > module.. picked up the patch from ur site
> > > FD_SETSIZE is 16384
> > > my start up scripts
> > > echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > > echo 16384>/proc/sys/fs/file-max
> > > echo 32768 >/proc/sys/fs/inode-max
> > > echo 8192 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog
> > > echo 1024 65000 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
> > > echo 30 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
> > > echo 300 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time
> > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
> > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
> > > echo 5>/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syn_retries
> > > echo 10 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_interval
> > > echo 2>/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval # used these for
> > > avoiding the dst cache overflow msgs that i used to get
> > > echo 30 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout
> > >
> > > echo "60 1000 128 256 500 3000 500 1884 2" >/proc/sys/vm/bdflush
> > > echo "256 512 1024" >/proc/sys/vm/freepages
> > >
> > > Yes i have read all the docs on your website
> > >
> > > Do i need to furnish some more info
> > > awaiting responses ..
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Khiz
Received on Sat Feb 09 2002 - 05:11:19 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:06:13 MST