Fw: [squid-users] how always_direct deny foo differs from never_direct allow foo

Hello Henrik,

             What will happen when I use never_direct in both parent and
sibling ? I await a reply with anticipation.

TIA,
-shadha

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@marasystems.com>
To: <Weronicaain@yahoo.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] how always_direct deny foo differs from
never_direct allow foo

> always_direct allow ...
>
> forces Squid to go direct, ignoring any cache_peer lines you have.
>
>
> never_direct allow ...
>
> forces Squid to never go direct, requiring the use of a cache_peer.
>
>
> If neither is allow, then Squid usually tries to use uses a cache_peer
> for requests where the request may be served from cache, else direct.
>
>
> If both are allow then always_direct have higher priority.
>
> Regards
> Henrik Nordström
> MARA Systems AB
>
>
> Weronicaain@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > Will any squid gurus explain with eg how
> > always_direct deny foo differs from never_direct
> > allow foo
> >
> > And also ....How squid allows ftp sites ( squid being as http proxy)
> >
> > TIA
> >

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Received on Mon Dec 17 2001 - 06:55:28 MST