RE: [squid-users] Using squid 2.4 as an accelerator

I am getting what appears to be the infamous "WARNING: Forwarding loop
detected for" message. I say infamous because the mailing list seems to be
full of discussions relating to it. However, the answers found in the list
don't seem to apply to me. I am NOT using cache peering.

Here is a complete error message:

Dec 10 13:11:39 gatekeeper squid[390]: WARNING: Forwarding loop detected
for: GET / HTTP/1.0^M Accept: text/html, text/plain, text/sgml, video/mpeg,
image/jpeg, image/tiff, image/x-rgb, image/png, image/x-xbitmap,
image/x-xbm, image/gif, application/postscript, */*;q=0.01^M
Accept-Encoding: gzip, compress^M Accept-Language: en^M User-Agent:
Lynx/2.8.4rel.1 libwww-FM/2.14^M Via: 1.0 gatekeeper.actioncore.com:80
(Squid/2.4.STABLE2)^M X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.0.2^M Host: 192.168.0.2^M
Cache-Control: max-age=259200^M Connection: keep-alive^M ^M

I am testing Squid internally, and the hostname I am using is in /etc/hosts,
but is fake for now. Its IP address is 192.168.0.2, and is dual homed with
the webservers in 10.0.0.0/24 behind it. I have tried accessing the page via
lynx both on the local Squid machine and remotely and get:

[--snip--]
   While trying to retrieve the URL: http://192.168.0.2/

   The following error was encountered:
     * Access Denied.
       Access control configuration prevents your request from being allowed
at this time. Please contact your service provider
       if you feel this is incorrect.

   Your cache administrator is webmaster.

   Generated Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:11:39 GMT by gatekeeper.actioncore.com
(Squid/2.4.STABLE2)
[--snip--]

My configuration is pretty simple:

[---snip---]
http_port 0.0.0.0:80
visible_hostname gatekeeper.actioncore.com
cache_effective_user squid
cache_effective_group squid
acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
http_access allow all
httpd_accel_host 10.0.0.22
httpd_accel_port 80
httpd_accel_uses_host_header on
[---snip---]

I purposely have Squid wide open with 'http_access allow all' for testing
purposes. Note that gatekeeper is a FreeBSD router between networks
192.168.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.0/24. The webservers are in 10.0.0.0/24.

Any clues what the problem could be?

Regards, Dustin

---
Dustin Puryear <dpuryear@usa.net>
Information Systems Consultant
http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams