Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.4.STABLE2 slowdown?

Speaking of networking with Kernel 2.4.x - how can I see NAT connections
going through my box?

netstat -m doesn't work anymore... and neither does ipchains -L -M - whats
the correct way for iptables/netfilter?

-Ahsan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Smith" <peter.smith@UTSouthwestern.edu>
To: "Troels Arvin" <troels@tv2i.dk>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.4.STABLE2 slowdown?

> Hmm that is a good possibility. I'll center my efforts more on getting
> 2.4.x alive than trying to debug the 2.2.19/slowdowns I'm having.
> Thanks for the help and good info!
>
> Peter Smith
>
>
> Troels Arvin wrote:
>
> > Peter Smith <peter.smith@UTSouthwestern.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> File descriptor usage for squid:
> >> Maximum number of file descriptors: 4096
> >> Largest file desc currently in use: 791
> >
> >
> >> Number of file desc currently in use: 700
> >
> >
> >
> > That looks OK.
> >
> >> However since you mention kernel, I forgot to say in my original post
> >> that I'm running a RH7.0 2.2.19-7.0.8smp kernel on my RH7.1 proxies.
> >
> >
> >
> > One of our Squid-boxes runs Red Hat 7.0 and uses
> > "2.2.19-7.0.12enterprise" (latest official RH-kernel for RH 7.0).
> >
> > An other of our Squid boxes runs RH 7.1 and uses 2.4.9-12enterprise
> > (latest official RH-kernel for RH 7.1).
> >
> > Both run fine. However, I wouldn't do what you do. There could be
> > glibc<->kernel issues with our cocktail.
> >
> >> It sounds like this older kernel could be my limitting factor?
> >
> >
> > Actually, I don't think that the 2.4 Linux kernel is that much more
> > effecient than the 2.2 generation for my purposes. But I would not be
> > surprised if you get trouble if you introduce a old kernel generation
> > into a new Linux distribution tailored for the 2.4 kernel generation.
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 06 2001 - 11:55:13 MST