On Thursday 29 November 2001 11.28, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> I can tell you what we are doing with squid - as a reverse proxy.
I know perfectly well what you are doing. Read my answer again.
I wrote (slightly corrected for spelling errors):
> I partly agree, but even then it has to be done in controlled manners.
> The interactions between a origin server and it's surrogate cache needs
> to be thought over proper, and then some time needs to be spent on
> having Squid and the origin servers implement these interactions
> correctly. So far no one has been willing to put the effort or resources
> needed to complete such a task for Squid. Such a task, if done proper,
> will result in a checklist on how origin servers SHOULD behave to
> interact proper with the surrogate, and a couple of knobs in Squid to
> tune things.
>
> The concern I expressed earlier is that these types of overrides does
> not ever belong in a proxy, and even having the possibility to enable
> them may be bad enough. There is a very obvious conflict between the
> two applications of Squid.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Explanations:
surrogate cache -> The cache in a server acting as a surrogate for the real
server
surrogate -> a server acting as a surrogate for another server, for example
by reverse proxying.
-- MARA Systems AB Giving you basic free Squid support Priority support or Squid enhancements available on requestReceived on Thu Nov 29 2001 - 06:54:50 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:04:43 MST