Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.3.3 vs Squid 2.2.5

Cool! This actually fixed my problem.
Thanx a lot

Lorenzo

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordström" <hno@marasystems.com>
To: "Lorenzo" <lorenzo@royal.it>; <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.3.3 vs Squid 2.2.5

> On Tuesday 20 November 2001 11.36, Lorenzo wrote:
>
> > I've got a problem: I'm running two squid server, first one is Squid
2.2.5
> > running on Intel based RedHat 7.1, while the other is Squid 2.3.3
running
> > on Sparc Solaris 8. I've notice what follows: on 2.2.5 I cannot handle
> > multiple squid instances (i.e. 2 processes running on different ports),
> > while I can do this on 2.3.3.
>
> You sure can. Same restrictions on both versions in that they cannot share
> ports or cache. If the instances are configured to not share anything then
> running more than one is no problem, and has never been.
>
> Please remember that you need to have all ports unique, not only the
> http_port. You also need to care for any ICP, SNMP or HTCP ports your
Squid's
> opens.
>
> > But when I try to make an ACL on 2.2.5 with destination server names,
> > it works fine on 2.2.5 (i.e. aol.com works for www.aol.com,
bogus.aol.com,
> > fake.aol.com) but not on 2.3.3 (i.e. in the case above aol.com doesn't
> > works at all, I have to manually specify www.aol.com, bogus.aol.com,
> > fake.aol.com,etc.).Am I wrong with something or is this supposed to
happen
> > ?
>
> You need to use .aol.com for matching a domain. Without the leading dot it
> only matches the exact host name. This has been a bit inconsistent in
earlier
> Squid releases.
>
> --
> MARA Systems AB
> Giving you basic free Squid support
> Priority support or Squid enhancements available on request
>
Received on Tue Nov 20 2001 - 06:01:38 MST