Re: [squid-users] ufs or aufs?

aufs if you need to support more than about 20-30 requests/second.

aufs in Sqid-2.3 is quite broken, better in 2.4. 2.5 should work fine.

Squid-2.3 is no longer supported. Current supported version is
Squid-2.4.STABLE2 + some patches. Squid-2.5 is about to be released.

Regards
Henrik Nordström
Squid Hacker

On Monday 19 November 2001 12.56, Torsten.Lange@GECITS-EU.COM wrote:
> hi there,
>
> this is a rather philosophical question...
>
> on a single-processor machine, which cache_dir type would you
> recommend, ufs or aufs?
>
> my polygraph benchmarks showed that aufs does perform better,
> but the cache efficiency drops significantly on high req/s load.
>
> the squid version is 2.3.stable5 on linux 2.4.13
>
> thanks for your input.

-- 
MARA Systems AB
Giving you basic free Squid support
Priority support or Squid enhancements available on request