Re: [squid-users] price/performance

Thanks for the clarification
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre van Zyl" <vanzyla@fmd.gov.za>
To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] price/performance

> The costs shown are not for the software only. These figures are the total
> cost of the entire "solution" entered, and so include costs for the server
> hardware, switches and/or routers, as well as the software and OS. See
> section 8: Product configurations to see the exact breakdown of each
entry.
>
> AD.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kareem Mahgoub [mailto:kashraf@thewayout.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:45 AM
> > To: Vivek Sadananda Pai; squid-users@squid-cache.org
> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] price/performance
> >
> >
> > Just wondering
> > Is this an advertisement for Microsoft?!:)
> > theoretically squid must be the higher one as price = 0 $
> > so Hit rate / Price = infinity
> > thanks
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vivek Sadananda Pai" <vivek@imimic.com>
> > To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:51 AM
> > Subject: [squid-users] price/performance
> >
> >
> > > Disclaimer: I work for a caching company
> > >
> > > Someone was asking about price/performance. Here are the
> > price/performance
> > > links for the last cacheoff. The Squid entries are in black.
> > >
> > > price/performance by cache hits
> > >
> > http://www.measurement-factory.com/results/public/cacheoff/N03/aut
> > o/all/hit.
> > rate_price.ratio.html
> > >
> > > price/performance by hits+misses
> > >
> > http://www.measurement-factory.com/results/public/cacheoff/N03/aut
> > o/all/rep.
> > rate_price.ratio.html
> > >
> > > The last polygraph results for CacheFlow are at
> > > http://polygraph.ircache.net/Results/dcomm-1.cacheflow/
> > > However, I'd be surprised if CacheFlow can still get
> > > anyone to pay those prices :-)
> > >
> > > -Vivek
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 13 2001 - 02:39:54 MST