Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate problem

Allan Lyons wrote:

> Others have had similar problems. I think that this is similar to Bug #150.
>
> I had the same problem and I just tried increasing the cache sizes. However, yours are already much larger than mine ever
> were. I haven't yet had a chance to really test my new setup yet.
>
> Currently, my wild guesses about why this might be happening has to do with maximum_object_size_in_memory. See what
> happens if you make it larger than the patches that you are getting via Windows Update. Another guess is that there might
> be an issue with the cache replacement algorithm when it comes to expiring old objects when new larger objects come
> through. Again, these are just guesses that I have no proof at all for.
>
> This might be difficult to do, but does everything work if the cache is completely empty?
>
> If you figure out how to make it work, post the details here. Perhaps that might help the developers figure out what is really
> going on.
>
> Allan.

Hello.

Today I have tried windowsupdate again.
Everything now works fine.
But the change since yesterday is only rotating logs!!!
It is mysticism 8-|

PS. Yesterday when I tried without squid - everything worked,
    but with squid did not.

--
Alexei Malinin,
System Administrator of
Siberian Aluminium Group