RE: [squid-users] ext2 vs. reiserfs performance

From: BAARDA, Don <don.baarda@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:01:53 +0930

G'day,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Cooper [mailto:joe@swelltech.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:54 AM
> To: Torsten.Lange@GECITS-EU.COM
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] ext2 vs. reiserfs performance
>
>
> I'll comment:
>
> I think it's exceedingly accurate, and an astonishingly well written
> article.

Hah :-) Just had a look and saw that you wrote it :-)

Interesting that this article is a year old. It advocated a 2.2.16 kernel
with UDMA and Reiser patches, running 2.2.STABLE5 Squid. What is the latest
advice? I would have thought 2.4.x would be better with Reiser now, and
2.4.STABLE squids probably benefit less from Reiser.

ABO
Received on Thu Sep 20 2001 - 17:32:15 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:19 MST