Re: [squid-users] Two squid installations

From: Senthil Kumar <senthil@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:57:59 +0530

Yeah thats a good idea but the problem is my users are brilliant enough :-)
to find out new sites which offer free webmails. And my company is strictly
against sending of attachments in those mails. here the sleezeball acts as
my saviour. I have a line mentioning like / mails/ and /mail / which
prevents the mail sites from loading. Thats why i was going towards two
different installations. Am i right ? I feel foolish when i am having
a silly problem like this in front of experts in this list but alas i am a
newbie in front this lion in the caching server jungle !!!!!

senthil

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Campbell" <sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au>
To: "Senthil Kumar" <senthil@yashaa.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Two squid installations

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Senthil Kumar wrote:

> Why not used time acls in combination with the others?
>
> eg
>
> acl day MTWHF 08:00-17:00
> acl okay dstdomain .here.com
>
> http_access allow okay day
> http_access allow !day
>
> which (I think :-) will only allow access to *.here.com during the day,
> (Mon-Fri, 8am-5pm) but every else outside those hours.
>
> Colin
>
Received on Wed Sep 12 2001 - 23:25:21 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:09 MST