Re: [squid-users] Performance Problem

This is slightly off topic, but...
We had no problems with our warranty, using Kingston ECC RAM
(as at one stage, Sun actually SUPPLIED Kingston ECC RAM to us
as they had "run out" of supplies). The only difference we
found (which was a problem) is that some non-Sun RAM boards
are slightly thicker, which forcibly separates the pins in
the slots, making subsequent use of Sun RAM slightly
problematical in SOME instances... We never experienced
any problems, but a Sun techie said some other people had
(their story, not mine).

Chris K.
(Australia)

Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > > 1GB is enough. doesn't normal ECC DIMMs work?
> > Pushing it slightly, I'd say. With a cache size of 100GB I'm using just
> > over a gigabyte of RAM for the squid process. 1.5GB to 2GB is probably
> > more realistic.
> on ultrasparc maybe where object info structure is larger.
> and i'm using 2.2STABLE5 as 2.4S1 were infinitely growing on my system
> getting even 120MB while this uses no more than 80. and asyncufs is fully
> working here.
> > > Crucial have a nice page for checking compatible ram types that seems
> > > to cover most suns:
> > > http://www.crucial.com/UK/store/listProductLine.asp?mfr=Sun&x=8&y=7
> > What I'm never sure of with buying server RAM from third parties is how it
> > affects the warranty. Comparing for instance official Dell prices and
> > Crucial prices, what do I get for paying 6 times as much to Dell? :-)
> > --------------- Robin Stevens <robin.stevens@oucs.ox.ac.uk> -----------------
> > Oxford University Computing Services ----------- Web: http://www.cynic.org.uk/
> > ------- (+44)(0)1865: 273212 (work) 273275 (fax) Mobile: 07776 235326 -------
Received on Fri Sep 07 2001 - 10:23:47 MDT