(Talking to myself again.)
A day later, still no leaks. Looks like this was the problem.
-- Brian
On Sunday 02 September 2001 10:46 pm, Brian wrote:
> I think we have a winner!
>
> storeAufsClose checks to see if there are pending operations on the file
> and sets a flag, rather than initiates a close, if there are.
> storeAufsReadDone checks the flag just before returning, but
> storeAufsOpenDone does not.
>
> I'm not sure what triggers an open without a read (an IMS request for a
> stale object, I suspect -- this squid gets an unusually high number of
> them), but it hasn't misplaced an FD in the 4 hours I've run this patch
> so far. I guess I'll know for sure tomorrow.
>
> -- Brian
Received on Mon Sep 03 2001 - 20:35:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:01 MST