On 25 Jul 2001 16:53:46 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Colin Campbell wrote:
>
> > Why not look in access.log? If the page was in the cache, you'll
> > get a log entry saying it was. In store.log you'll also see
> > information about where in the cache (memory/disk) the object
> > resides
>
> Sure! Works as well, provided the logs are accessible to the tester.
> Logs have the same limitation: one cannot check for domains, only for
> specific URLs (that were requested after the log creation time).
>
> Alex.
>
Actually, for this case, swap.log is probably a better place to look -
it tells you whether an object is stored to disk, or thrown away.
Rob
Received on Wed Jul 25 2001 - 17:15:46 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:01:19 MST