Re: [squid-users] Not caching?

Oh right.. shame, the likes of wingate cache it perfectly
It seems that very few pages are totally cacheable with squid, since not
many pages are static.

refresh_pattern ^ftp: 1440 20% 10080
refresh_pattern ^gopher: 1440 0% 1440
refresh_pattern . 0 20% 4320
refresh_pattern ^http: 10000 25% 10080

I have no idea if the refresh_pattern for ^http is correct or not.

Cheers

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Brian wrote:

> On Sunday 08 July 2001 08:43 am, Duncan wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Here is an example of what i get in my access.log, after going to
> > http://www.yahoo.com (not the first time).
> >
> > 10.0.0.0 - - [08/Jul/2001:13:43:34 +0100] "GET
> > http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.co\m/i/ww/m5v5.gif HTTP/1.0" 304 262
> > TCP_IMS_HIT:NONE
> > 10.0.0.0 - - [08/Jul/2001:13:43:35 +0100] "GET
> > http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.co\m/a/co/compaq_comp_corp/powered_by_whit
> >e_95x30.gif HTTP/1.0" 304 262 TCP_IMS_HI\T:NONE
> > 10.0.0.0 - - [08/Jul/2001:13:43:36 +0100] "GET http://www.yahoo.com/
> > HTTP/1.0" \200 18164 TCP_MISS:DIRECT
> > 10.0.0.0 - - [08/Jul/2001:13:43:37 +0100] "GET
> > http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.co\m/a/pr/promo/anchor/hp_careers5.gif
> > HTTP/1.0" 200 3565 TCP_MISS:DIRECT
> >
> > I see TCP_IMS_HITs, but no TCP_HITs? I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong
> > here. Should I enable reload_into_ims?
>
> No. Not only is it already an IMS (thus ignore-reload is the next step),
> but that only affects directives in the request so, unless you hit
> 'reload' in your browser, it's a squid or server issue.
>
> What do you have for your refresh_pattern lines?
>
> > The TCP_MISS:DIRECT suggests that squid went diretly to yahoo.com to get
> > the site, and not the cache? .. Any sugestions on how to prevent this,
>
> Since the response lacks an Expires or Last Modified header (or just about
> any headers at all), that page is not cachable.
>
> -- Brian
>
Received on Sun Jul 08 2001 - 14:07:24 MDT