Re: [squid-users] Optimal cache_dir L2 value for ReiserFS?

wojtek@3miasto.net wrote:

> i see but when i've used reiserfs i've never have such condition. does it
> show under heavy load only or with asyncufs only (i was using ufs)

asyncufs/aufs only. The other stores serializes all access (ufs
globally, diskd per cache dir) so directory locking is not an issue
there.. and for the "ufs" store you won't be able to have loads where
you need to start bothering about these things regardless if it is ext2
or reiserfs..

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid Hacker