See http://squid.sourceforge.net/tosaddracl/.
(tosaddracl has now got a web site, and is slowly getting polished up
for general use)
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid Hacker Edward wrote: > > When last was it updated? > > > http://squid.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/diff/rvenning_tosaddracl > > > > Author: Roger Venning > > No public web site, or project description yet apart from the > > documentation added to squid.conf. > > > > -- > > Henrik Nordstrom > > Squid Hacker > > > > > > Edward wrote: > > > > > > Hi Henrik! > > > > > > Can you please provide me with the link for rvenning_tosaddracl? > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Edward Millington > > > (Network Administrator & Senior Technical Support Technician) > > > Cariaccess Communications Ltd. > > > Bridgetown > > > Barbados > > > 1-246-430-7435 > > > Fax : 1-246-431-0170 > > > edward@cariaccess.com > > > www.cariaccess.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se> > > > To: "Edward" <edward@cariaccess.com> > > > Cc: "squid" <squid-users@squid-cache.org> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 3:51 PM > > > Subject: Re: [squid-users] routing OR different IP address > > > > > > > Edward wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have the a policy route to the cache on one ip address. > > > > > > > > > > eg > > > > > access-list 110 deny tcp any any neq www > > > > > access-list 110 deny tcp host 200.50.68.7 any > > > > [...] > > > > > The other IP is 64.110.11.2. > > > > > > > > > > As you can see here, the ciso is only sending to the 200.50.68.7. > > > > > > > > > > What I believe here, after sending you that email, 64.110.11.2 is > not > > > > > getting pass the router faste0/0 interface. > > > > > > > > Correct. Your Cisco does not know that 64.110.11.2 should not be > > > > redirected to 200.50.68.7. > > > > > > > > I seem to remember that your clients is actually on different subnets > > > > than your servers. In such case it is probably better to reverse the > > > > router ACL to tell what should be redirected rather than what should > > > > not. I.e. only redirect your client networks to the proxy. > > > > > > > > > If that is the case then I will have to add > > > > > > > > > > access-list 110 deny tcp host 64.110.11.2 any > > > > > > > > > > to the access-list. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think Henrik? > > > > > > > > Not a Cisco expert, but it looks like a step in the correct direction. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Henrik Nordstrom > > > > Squid Hacker > > > > > > > >Received on Thu May 10 2001 - 10:38:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:55 MST