Re: [squid-users] Fw: Update on Sattellite

Which one? (I gave you three options)

--
Henrik
Edward wrote:
> 
> I believe that option seem very good.
> 
> Just to clarify, all classes of IP goes through our upstream provider, but a
> certain class of IP's come through SAT.
> Best regards,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
> To: "Edward" <edward@cariaccess.com>
> Cc: "squid" <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Fw: Update on Sattellite
> 
> > I don't see the need for an additional NIC unless you need that for your
> > cabling purposes..
> >
> > If I understand your problem right you need to route requests from
> > different clients out on different paths. There are three ways you can
> > do this (and neither really requires an additional NIC, but it might
> > simplify your networking cabling/routing)
> >
> > a) Run more than one Squid, one for each set of users
> >
> > b) Have a parent proxy for one of the groups (or one for each), and use
> > cache_peer_access to send the correct user group there
> >
> > c) Use a Squid-2.5 patched with the tosaddracl patch to allow Squid to
> > select different outgoing IP's for each group of users, and then set up
> > your routing to have each of these IP's routed appropriately.
> >
> > --
> > Henrik Nordstrom
> > Squid Hacker