RE: [squid-users] MRTG monitoring.

In our crontab:

2-57/5 * * * * /usr/local/bin/mrtg /data/mrtgconf/cedar.cfg > /dev/null 2>&1

All the errors go into the black hole....

Randy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squid-users-return-1330-dcosby=infowest.com@squid-cache.org
> [mailto:squid-users-return-1330-dcosby=infowest.com@squid-cache.org]On
> Behalf Of Palmer J.D.F.
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:00 AM
> To: Squid Users List
> Subject: [squid-users] MRTG monitoring.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using MRTG 2.9.10 to monitor my two caches and a whole bunch of other
> stuff, damn fine it is too.
>
> A problem that I have is that I have a root mailbox on my
> monitoring machine
> full of SNMP errors. All the same, this doesn't really bother me
> that there
> are errors 'cos with the amount of stuff that is being monitored it is not
> too unusual for something to not respond, what I'd like to know is how to
> tell MRTG to stop mailing me the errors. I have something like 20000 of
> these messages.
>
> Has anyone any Ideas?
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
> Jezz.
>
> ****************************************
> Jezz Palmer.
> Internet Systems Officer.
> Library and Information Services
> University of Wales, Swansea
> Singleton Park
> Swansea
> SA2 8PP
> Tel 01792 513260
> ****************************************
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denis Haskin [mailto:dwhaskin@earthlink.net]
> Sent: 10 April 2001 13:28
> To: Squid Users List
> Cc: tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] How to determine why an object isn't being
> cached?
>
> Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:11:59 -0400, Denis Haskin
> > <dwhaskin@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > >I find it a little
> > >vague on how authentication affects cachability.
> >
> > I think the Squid FAQ is clear on this specific issue
> > http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-12.html#ss12.23
>
> Aha. I missed that. Thanks--that is very clear.
>
> This is more a question on HTTP, but: if a request includes an
> "Authorization:" header, and the origin response includes "Cache-control:
> Public", does that mean the cache will now fulfill subsequent requests for
> the object *without* requiring an authorization header? In other
> words, the
> object suddenly no longer requires authorization?
>
> Thanks,
>
> dwh
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 10 2001 - 10:44:26 MDT