Hi,
I've read in the archives that the dst ACL element is not supported by
the no_cache operator. While I've observed this to indeed be the case,
I've also seen in my cache.log with a high level of debugging that Squid
is checking the dst ACL list for that operator, and coming up with
appropriate matches. My question then is this: why, if it does the
checking and makes a match, doesn't it then obey the no_cache operator?
Is it just that the logs show the checking regardless of the success or
otherwise of their use by a particular operator?
Are there any plans to support dst elements for this operator?
Jamie
Received on Thu Apr 05 2001 - 20:21:27 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:10 MST