How large object workingset in relation to your RAM size have you been
testing with?
All my tests have shown a great dependency on the disk service time..
(which is in proportion to the seek time and workload)
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid Hacker David Rumble wrote: > > Hello > > As Squid is an I/O intensive app, I have been working with a major user of > Squid running on Linux RH 2.2.16.(bespoke). Hardware no name 512MB, single > p2 300. Two test machines have been setup, One with a platypus Qikdrive > www.platypus.net (SSD 2GB capacity, upto 10MBps/15k Tps/Access times - 3/10 > MICROSECONDS. The other with 2GB Scsi HDD. > > After considerable testing there is no performance gain as far as HIT access > times are concerned. According to the drive spec/requestsPs equation one > would expect a significant improvement. (requests/sec1000000/access time). > Cpu and Bandwidth are within tolerances. > > Does Squid use DISKD to cache to RAM? Are there any configs that need > changing? Any advice,comments would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards > David Rumble > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Name: winmail.dat > Part 1.2 Type: application/ms-tnef > Encoding: base64Received on Wed Mar 28 2001 - 03:20:18 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:00 MST