Re: [SQU] Memory Leak??

Ok, that shouldn't be enough to cause the perception of a leak. (I've
seen leak accusations in the past that were just the caches in-core
index filling up! ;-)

I haven't seen any leaks in Squid...but I do not use the 2.3 series at
all. I've only done a bit of benchmarking and testing with it a long
time ago...so maybe one crept in in the 2.3 tree that I'm unaware of.
But I haven't seen one mentioned on the lists.

Perhaps there is something else amiss on the system? Have you tried
reducing your system down to nothing but Squid (and whatever else is
absolutely necessary)?

bretwatson@charteredsemi.com wrote:

> 3 dirs each 10Gb
>
> Bret Watson
>
> Joe Cooper
> <joe@swelltec To: bretwatson@charteredsemi.com
> h.com> cc: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Re: [SQU] Memory Leak??
> 07/03/01
> 08:52
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How big are your cache_dirs?
>
> bretwatson@charteredsemi.com wrote:
>
>
>> Hi People,
>> I've been running squid on a nice new box with 1G of RAM for about a week
>> now, I've noticed that I seem to get a lot of memory labelled "Inactive"
>> this memory seems to slowly increase in line with Squid's process size. I
>> am expecting it to get to a point where squid will start using swap...
>
> The
>
>> kernel has been customised to allow a process to get to 256M
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
> Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
> http://www.swelltech.com

-- 
                                   --
                      Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
                  Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
                         http://www.swelltech.com
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html