Re: [SQU] current CVS ... diskd config args changed ...

I benchmarked them a couple of months back. aufs was, then, about 10%
faster than diskd on a dual disk system.

I have not yet benchmarked a recent 2.4PRE-STABLE Squid, however.

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> aufs is quite likely better than diskd on Linux (haven't benchmarked
> them yet, so I have no proofs).
>
> On FreeBSD the situation is the reverse.
>
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid hacker
>
>
> Hamid Hashemi Golpayegani wrote:
>
>> so is it better for me to use ReiserFS with aufs or diskd ? is there any
>> document for this ? or only change ufs with diskd or aufs ?

                                   --
                      Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
                  Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
                         http://www.swelltech.com

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html