On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Rainer Ginsberg wrote:
> I was thinking about how to remedy this problem: My idea is to give
> the machine as many IP addresses as it has processes. Then start the
> same amount of Squid processes where each of them listens on one of
> the IP addresses. Then you could apply load balancing, either via DNS
> (cheap but not perfect) or with dedicated load-balancing appliances
> (very expensive).
Is there a problem? The current implementation offers the best possible
performance when there are fewer than 4 processors.
> The problem with this approach is that the Squid processes might not
> "agree" on using different CPUs but all processes clogging to one or
> two CPUs and thus reducing performance.
>
> Has anybody else thought about a solution for Squid on multiprocessor
> systems?
With the cost of 1U/2U server systems under $2000, just plop another system
in the rack. Repeat until you feel comfortable with the performance.
Merton
-- To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.htmlReceived on Tue Dec 05 2000 - 07:10:39 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:56:51 MST