Re: [SQU] Disk access as Squid bottleneck?

From: Ilker Gokhan <IlkerG@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:23:03 +0200

You can find further information about hard disks into the squid's user
guide. There is a calculation method.

client's requests per second = 1000 / seek time of disk / number of
cache_dir disk

Best regards,
Ilker G.

> Kimden: Steve Snyder [mailto:swsnyder@home.com]
> Tarih: Monday, November 20, 2000 2:46 AM
> Kime: Squid Mailing List
> Konu: [SQU] Disk access as Squid bottleneck?
>
>
> My Squid (v2.3S4) cache has plenty of CPU and RAM available
> to it. Also,
> the hard disk on which the cache is stored has twice transfer
> rate of the
> 100Mbps network that the data crosses. Given these facts, am
> I correct in
> thinking that disk access time is the bottleneck for my
> cache's throughput?
>
> My hard disk is a very good IDE drive, but it has an IDE
> drive's access
> time: 8.5ms. With sub-5.0ms SCSI drives on the market, I wonder if it
> makes sense to get one as a replacement for my current drive.
> I'm willing
> to spend the money, but I want to feel confident that the
> reduced access
> time will really be noticeable as improved cache performance.
>
> Any thoughts on this topic?
>
> *** Steve Snyder ***
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>

Bu e-postada bulunan tüm fikir ve görüşler ve ekindeki dosyalar sadece adres
sahib(ler)ine ait olup, Sümerbank A.Ş hiç bir şekilde sorumlu tutulamaz.
The information contained in this E-Mail and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed and do not reflect those of Sumerbank A.S.

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Mon Nov 20 2000 - 01:30:42 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:56:27 MST