I've been revising some of the acls on our Squid caches and noticed what
seems to be a discrepancy between the range of Safe_ports, which
includes the range 1025-65535 and IANA's list
(http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers), which has
well-known-ports as 0-1023, registered ports 1024-49151 and
dynamic/private ports as 49152-65535.
Is Squid's range intended to match IANA's, and if so, should the range
in Safe_ports not start at 1024 instead of 1025?
The reason I ask is that I had to include an acl to allow access to a
service on port 1024 at archive.stsci.edu, which would not have been
required if Squid had that port as "safe" by default. We're in a cache
hierarchy, so I can't simply change Safe_ports on our cache, because our
parent caches most likely don't allow URLs with port 1024. I also need
to use allow_direct to bypass our parents.
Not a big issue, I know, but maybe one that could be corrected in future
releases?
-- David Osborne david.osborne@nottingham.ac.uk Academic Computing Services phone/voicemail: +44 (0)115 951 3397 The University of Nottingham fax: +44 (0)115 951 3358 Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~cczdao/ -- To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.htmlReceived on Fri Nov 17 2000 - 10:29:37 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:56:26 MST