RE: [SQU] lru or heap LRU (Squid V2.4)

Hi Val,

Studies & simulations shows that LRU performs little bit better tha LRU_H
(LRU Heap) in terms of number of objects served from squid-Cache. But LRU
tends to be more CPU intensive than LRU_H. Now it depends on your
requirement that whether you want to serve more objects from cache or you
have slower CPU at proxy.

Henrik,

Could you please tell me what are the values of watermark in Squid
implementation for LRU_H.

Thanks
~ Randeep

-----Original Message-----
From: Valentin Chopov [mailto:valentin@valcho.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 AM
To: Henrik Nordstrom
Cc: squid-users@ircache.net
Subject: Re: [SQU] lru or heap LRU (Squid V2.4)

Henrik,

thank you for the quick reply. Do you have any info about which of both
impllementations gives better results?

Thanks again,

Val

On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Valentin Chopov wrote:
> >
> > Is there any differencies between both cache replacement policies?
>
> The two policies are similar, the actual implementation is very
> different.
>
> HEAP LRU is provided as a reference to compare the HEAP implementation
> to the "normal" LRU policy.
>
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid hacker
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html