With the new high-bandwidth access methods like ADSL, and the fact that
bandwidth is getting cheaper a lot faster than big servers with lots
of disk space, using a proxy cache doesn't necessarily save bandwidth
anymore. With lots of high-speed users a small 100 GB cache won't
have the chance to cache much - objects will be replaced too fast.
Now, I see one other very good reason for using a cache: to minimize
latency. So it would be a good idea if LRU replacement could be changed
into FD replacement: Fastest Download. Objects that took a lot of
time to download stay longer in the cache than nearby objects that
can be downloaded at max speed anyway. A combination of the two
would be best, ofcourse.
Has anyone ever done some work on this? It can't be a novel idea.
Mike.
-- Cistron Certified Internetwork Expert #1. Think free speech; drink free beer. -- The From: and Reply-To: addresses are internal news2mail gateway addresses. Reply to the list or to miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)Received on Tue Aug 08 2000 - 19:20:18 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:54:47 MST