Re: A newbie question: A high range of PAGEFAULTS

Thanks for your email. As a temporary solution, I decreased mem_cache to the
default amount of 8 M. The range of page faults is resonable now. But I'm going
to check another factors influencing the performance.

thanks anyway,
Nazila M.

> From: "fatemi" <fatemi@kafsa.com>
> To: "Nazila Mofrad" <mofrad@dpiran.net>
> Cc: <squid-users@ircache.net>
> Subject: Re: A newbie question: A high range of PAGEFAULTS
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:38:04 +0430
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>
> firstly checkout for maximum & average object size.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Mehrdad Fatemi
> R&D Director
>
> < AFRANET Co. ---------------------------- R&D Dept. >
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >First of all, sorry if this question has been already answered here
> (although I
> >performed a search and didn't fine that). I have a huge amuont of page
> fault on
> >Squid cache server. I got it from MRTG's output. It's about 750 Kb/s, even
> >though the usage of memory is around zero! The total memory of the server
> is 192
> >Meg., and it has 25 G hard disks. The output of "top" command shows using
> around
> >%90 of the momory by Squid process.
> >The point is there is another Squid cache on another computer with 192 M
> RAM and
> >29 G hard disk, but without this range of page fault.
> >
> >Can anyone point me out to the factors which make these differences or the
> hight
> >rate of page faults?
> >
> >All comments are mostly appreciated.
> >thanks,
> >Nazila M.
> >
> >
Received on Tue Jul 25 2000 - 03:47:27 MDT