Yes, all of the proxy servers' cache filesystems are either mounted as
async or soft-update. I also notice that those FreeBSD 3.4 machines
have much worse response time when the number of request is higher than
1400 per minute. The one with FreeBSD 2.2 is still very happy to serve
over 2000 request per minute. How about yours? I am afraid that ours
just hit the limit? ;-(
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:01:37AM -0500, Chris Dillon wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, SO Kwok Tsun wrote:
>
> > It seems to be something related to disk io. Are there something
> > special in FreeBSD 3.x? Do anyone have similar observation?
> > Thanks a lot.
>
> Do you have the cache filesystems on the FreeBSD 2.2.x boxes mounted
> async? If so, you will need to do the same on the 3.x boxes, or use
> SoftUpdates, which is an even safer/better solution. By the way,
> FreeBSD 3.5 is now available, as well as 4.0. 4.1 will be released
> shortly. I have been running Squid on FreeBSD 3.3 up to 3.5-STABLE
> and now on 4.1 without any problems.
>
>
> -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net
> FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet.
> For Intel x86 and Alpha architectures. ( http://www.freebsd.org )
>
Received on Wed Jul 19 2000 - 13:29:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:54:33 MST