Cor Bosman wrote:
> The investment really isnt the problem. If I want a 200gb system I get a
> 200gb system. But if on a 25gb system i already see 800mb processes on
> 2.3-STABLE1, im a bit worried about a 100gb system :)
There is a couple of bugs in the distrubuted Squid version that causes
memory usage to temporary rise considerably during certain request
patterns. I have a set of patches is available from
http://squid.sourceforge.net/hno/
I run a couple of patchy 2.2.STABLE5 20GB caches (cache size, disk size
is a bit larger) pulling about 10Mbit/s per box and the memory usage is
very stable now.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Sat Mar 04 2000 - 16:31:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:51:54 MST