Brian wrote:
> Can anyone comment on this with certainty? Is raid0 a definite
> performance hit/miss as opposed to multiple cache_dirs? Lets say we are
> talking about a 8 drive system.
There should not be any major performance difference, unless the RAID0
is poorly implemented and adds a noticeable amount of overhead.
Having multiple cache_dir is easier to maintain in case of drive faulure
or restructuring.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Sat Mar 04 2000 - 16:19:31 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:51:54 MST