Re: Disk full errors with Squid2.3S1 and Solaris

well I am late for the answer as i am looking my digest, But i have find no
sign that the disk usage become high becouse of that , I am thinking on it
and as well as looking in my squid also., can u send me u r Cache_Dir &
Cache_Digest TAGS so i can compare them.??

With Regards
Ahsan Khan
Sr. System Admin
Internet Division (OneNet)
Sun Communication Pvt. Ltd.
http://www.one.net.pk

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Bizzell" <bizzell@usq.edu.au>
To: "'Ahsan Khan'" <ahsank@one.net.pk>; <squid-users@ircache.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 3:23 AM
Subject: RE: Disk full errors with Squid2.3S1 and Solaris

> Thanks for the response. comments below.
>
> Mark.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahsan Khan [mailto:ahsank@one.net.pk]
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2000 7:21
> To: Mark Bizzell; squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Re: Disk full errors with Squid2.3S1 and Solaris
>
>
> did u mention filesystem type in cache_dir TAG.,
>
> It's ufs.
>
> have u check u r syslog is there any forwarding loop.???
>
> None that I can see.
>
> 3:- What are the inode Status on u r machine..??
> The disks have been built with
> newfs -m 2 -o space </dev/rdsk/...>
>
> Current usage
> Disk usage 93% ~1.8G
> Fragmentation 0.2%
> inodes free ~330,000
> cache_dir file size 1500
>
> I'm averaging a disk repartition every 10 days so I expect a disk full
error
> in about 8 hours.
>
> Another line of thought.
> We have 2 squid proxys in a sibling relationship. These communicate with 2
> parent squid proxy's. Could the transfer of the cache_digests be filling
up
> the disks ? My line of thought is that the cache_digest disk usage is not
> being included as part of the total disk available to squid and that the
> squid server continues to fill up the disk to the cache_dir size.
>
> Comments ?
>
>
Received on Thu Feb 17 2000 - 13:29:51 MST