RE: TCP_MISS/304

From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:57:46 -0000

> From: Duane Wessels [SMTP:wessels@ircache.net]
>
> The alternative would be to strip out the client's IMS header so that
> squid got thereply body, but this is not supported, and arguably not
> even a good idea.
>
        It's been argued on the list in the past that there is
        enough information in a 304 response to allow the cache
        to satisfy IMS requests from a cached 304. I've not
        verified this in detail and squid does not currently
        do this, which means we get a lot of these.
Received on Fri Jan 21 2000 - 19:01:57 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:38 MST