Re: Will there be a v2.2STABLE6?

On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 01:18:07AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Steve Snyder wrote:
> > I see that 6 bugs in Squid v2.2STABLE5 have been verified and fixed
> > "in 2.3". Will there be another release in the v2.2 series or are
> > we waiting for v2.3?
>
> The amount of known bugs/misfeatures in 2.2.STABLE5 is far greater than
> those 6 mentioned on the official bugs page, and more is likely to be
> found before Squid-2.3 sees the day. Some of the bugs in 2.2.STABLE5 is
> (in my opinion) quite fatal and if you sum them up then there surely is
> need for a STABLE6 release. Also, due to the amount of changes going
> into Squid-2.3 it will probably take a while before Squid-2.3 gets as
> stable as Squid-2.2.STABLE5+patches.

Henrik, is Squid-2.2.STABLE5+patches in your opinion more stable than
Squid-2.2.STABLE4+patches? I'm curious which I should run from a
maximum reliability standpoint. I keep hearing about bugs in STABLE5,
but I assume some of that is just the number of sites using it, and
that much of my positive experience with STABLE4 is just because it's
so underutilized here as yet.

  -- Clifton

-- 
 Clifton Royston  --  LavaNet Systems Architect --  cliftonr@lava.net
        "An absolute monarch would be absolutely wise and good.  
           But no man is strong enough to have no interest.  
             Therefore the best king would be Pure Chance.  
              It is Pure Chance that rules the Universe; 
          therefore, and only therefore, life is good." - AC