Hi guys,
Why not increase the cache_mem parameter ?
Fetching objects from mem is much,much faster (as stated in the FAQ ;-)) then getting object from disk ??
Why not defines a certain amount (like 64MB or so) for cache_mem ???
Suppose you have 256MB RAM ... I think you could spare 64MB for mem_cache not ???
Has anybody had bad expierence with this ???
I know I had ... but that came because I only HAD like 90MB RAM and defining 64MB as cache_mem made me ran into resource-trouble...
Regards,
Jan
Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 00:38:05 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:14 MST