On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> The net effect is that the async-io in Squid 2.3 may not perform as well
> or stable a in patched Squid-2.2, but in time there will be other
> alternatives which hopefully perform better, even thou it may take some
> time before everything is in place.
So.. if Squid/2.2.STABLE5 running async-io is "acceptably stable" for a
production proxy cache, would you recommend people *not* install Squid/2.3
(when released) until such time as a replacement for async-io is made
production-ready?
I'm concerned that having achieved stability and performance with async-io for
production proxies, going to Squid 2.3 would sacrifice either one or the
other - at least, on the same hardware... (there goes WCCP support.. *sigh*)
Thanks..
dave
Received on Sat Oct 02 1999 - 22:59:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:48:42 MST